Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1420 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Core i7-2675QM - 272 vs 252 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €120.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |