Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i7-2670QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4471 days newer than Core i7-2670QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2670QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 27% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-2670QM - 196 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2670QM - 32 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i7-2670QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2670QM | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
