Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4285 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Dead Space than Core i7-2635QM - 167 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€498.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €498.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |