Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3211 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 45 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 19% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-2635QM - 145 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€665.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €665.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |