Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600 is 653 days older than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-6300 - 251 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-2600 - €49.68 vs €211.2
- Up to 76% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-2600 - €0.2 vs €0.84 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €211.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |