Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 93% better in F1 23 than Core i7-3770S - 317 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - €113.29 vs €409.56
- Up to 47% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-14700F - €0.69 vs €1.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
317
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
53%
Price, €
€409.56
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €409.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
164
51%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |