Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10400F - 159 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 28 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - €92.96 vs €409.56
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-14700F - €0.7 vs €2.58 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.58/FPS
27%
Price, €
€409.56
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €409.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€92.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €92.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |