Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 5242 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 41% better in Alan Wake 2 than Phenom II X4 830 - 135 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - €27.62 vs €422.62
- Up to 91% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-14700F - €0.29 vs €3.13 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €422.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
96
71%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Core i7 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |