Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 13% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10900F - 193 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €314.9 vs €362.25
- Up to 2% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-13700KF - €1.84 vs €1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
97%
Price, €
€362.25
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for €362.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11014 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €314.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11015 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |