Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10100 - 754 vs 561 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €90.28 vs €367.98
- Up to 67% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-13700KF - €0.16 vs €0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
754
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
32%
Price, €
€367.98
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €367.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
561
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €90.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |