Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 5% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 115 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €90.91 vs €102.0
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 24 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €90.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74019 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
110
95.65217391304348%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€102
89%
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74019 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |