Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 579 vs 526 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.66 vs €0.72 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €379.64 vs €385.0
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
579
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€385
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
526
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
91%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |