Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-10100 - 476 vs 416 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €90.28 vs €383.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-13700F - €0.22 vs €0.81 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
476
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
27%
Price, €
€383.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
416
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €90.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |