Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - 166 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €373.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
16.185410334346503%
Multi-Core
739
5.007114303137069%
Intel Core i7-13700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |