Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 35% better in Battlefield V than FX-8350 - 282 vs 209 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - €155.88 vs €349.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-13700 - €0.75 vs €1.06 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
282
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
70.75471698113208%
Price, €
€349
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
209
74.11347517730496%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€155.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |