Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 3381 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6300 - 148 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - €49.68 vs €289.26
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-12700 - €0.43 vs €1.95 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
22%
Price, €
€289.26
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €289.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |