Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €245.43 vs €430.01
- Up to 43% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900KF - €1.28 vs €2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - 193 vs 191 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€245.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €245.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
57%
Price, €
€430.01
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |