Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3416 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 60% better in F1 23 than Phenom II X4 830 - 218 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €27.62 vs €149.87
- Up to 71% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-9400F - €0.2 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €149.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
136
62%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |