Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2645 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Remnant II than FX-4100 - 88 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €20.39 vs €148.54
- Up to 85% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-9400F - €0.26 vs €1.69 per FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €148.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Buy for €20.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |