Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 735 days older than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-9400F - 269 vs 266 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - €151.36 vs €203.31
- Up to 25% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-7600K - €0.57 vs €0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 6 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €203.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12954 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
266
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12954 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |