Buy on Amazon
€240.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7500 is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G4900 - 291 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-7500 - €60.24 vs €240.97
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-7500 - 54 vs 65 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-7500 3,40GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €240.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7500
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
48.503937007874015%
Multi-Core
1051
30.218516388729157%
Intel Core i5-7500 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
