Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3725 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 72% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €19.11 vs €69.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Rust than Athlon 3000G - €0.12 vs €0.39 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than Core i5-750 - 175 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €19.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-750 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Lynnfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |