Buy on Amazon
€24.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 455 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G4900 - 404 vs 378 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - €24.8 vs €60.24
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-7400 3,00GHz LGA1151 6MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €24.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
52.38095238095239%
Multi-Core
1051
32.51856435643564%
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
