Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 16 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - €60.24 vs €290.43
- Up to 77% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 7 2700X - €0.48 vs €2.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 10% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 138 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17169 minutes ago
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |