Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3138 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €89.07 vs €188.97
- Up to 47% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-13400F - €0.69 vs €1.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-4690K - 146 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 16 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
130
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
53%
Price, €
€188.97
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
88 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |