Buy on Amazon
€288
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-4790 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-4790 is 333 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-4790 - 45 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-4670T - 177 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-4670T - €157.65 vs €288.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-4670T - €0.89 vs €1.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
CPU Intel Core i5-4670T / LGA1150 / Tray
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Core i7-4790
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel i7-4790 Core Prozessor (3.6 GHz, Sockel 1150, 8M Cache, 84Watt)
Buy for €157.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-4670T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i7-4790
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | Intel Core i7-4790 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
