Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2524 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-4670T - 257 vs 253 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-4670T - €91.6 vs €288.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-4670T - €0.36 vs €1.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 12 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |