Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 1516 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 1200 - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-4670T - €34.94 vs €288.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670T - €0.2 vs €1.61 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
178
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €34.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |