Buy on Amazon
€288
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 1370 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Phenom II X4 830 - 177 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-4670T - €27.62 vs €288.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-4670T - €0.19 vs €1.63 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
CPU Intel Core i5-4670T / LGA1150 / Tray
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
148
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 830 CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,8 GHz 6M 95W Sockel AM2+ Sockel AM3
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-4670T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Haswell | Codename | Deneb |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
