Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6300 - 155 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-4670T - €49.68 vs €288.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-4670T - €0.33 vs €1.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 6 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |