Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3047 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-4300M - 208 vs 197 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-4300M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 37 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
