Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 372 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 37 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-4300M - 96 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 24 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |