Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4288U outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4288U is 224 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4288U
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6300 - 176 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 28 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4288U - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-4288U
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4288U | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 5100 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
