Buy on Amazon
€350.82
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2517 days newer than Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3470S - 178 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€350.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL Core i7-9700 3.0GHz LGA1151 12M Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €350.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3869 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
604
38.81748071979435%
Multi-Core
1724
27.73041659964613%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i5-3470S or Core i7-9700
Total War: WARHAMMER III, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
1 FPS
€769/FPS
GeForce GTX 1630
Core i7-9700
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€769
In Stock
1 FPS
€729/FPS
GeForce GTX 1630
Core i7-9700
8 GB, 256 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€729
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
