Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - €64.13 vs €275.06
- Up to 68% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-10700K - €1.39 vs €4.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than Core i5-3470S - 63 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
46
73%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11323 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.37/FPS
31%
Price, €
€275.06
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €275.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |