Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2315 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €33.68 vs €399.99
- Up to 91% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €0.1 vs €1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-3470S - 348 vs 323 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 24 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
323
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
348
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
8%
Price, €
€399.99
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |