Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2331 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 77 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3470 - 591 vs 464 FPS
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - €12.76 vs €72.67
- Up to 88% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3470 - €0.02 vs €0.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €72.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12975 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
591
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |