Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3877 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €72.67 vs €697.38
- Up to 86% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900KS - €0.19 vs €1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 77 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 32% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-3470 - 499 vs 378 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
378
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12870 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
499
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
13%
Price, €
€697.38
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €697.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12870 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |