Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3427U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3427U is 185 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3427U
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1620 - 149 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 17 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
148
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3427U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |