Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i5-3380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3655 days newer than Core i5-3380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3380M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-3380M - 239 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3380M - 16 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€147.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €147.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3380M | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |