Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4024 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 29% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-3340M - 414 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 32 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
