Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - €40.13 vs €261.39
- Up to 84% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 2700 - €0.21 vs €1.31 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-3330 - 200 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
192
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |