Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1062 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €129.97 vs €210.77
- Up to 32% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-11600K - €0.19 vs €0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than Ryzen 7 2700 - 759 vs 702 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
702
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6027 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
759
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
67%
Price, €
€210.77
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6027 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |