Buy on Amazon
€40.13
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 50 days older than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8300 - 375 vs 371 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than FX-8300 - €40.13 vs €73.57
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
CHYYAC Intel Core I5-3330 I5 3330 3,0 GHz Quad-Core CPU Prozessor 6M 77W LGA 1155
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75470 minutes ago
Hegem AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz Achtkern-8M-Prozessorsockel AM3+ CPU 95 W Großpackung FX-8300
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75470 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-3330 or FX-8300
Battlefield IV, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
30 FPS
€33.3/FPS
GeForce GT 710
FX-8300
8 GB, 500 GB HDD
Buy on Amazon
€999
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
