Buy on Amazon
€40.13
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €40.13 vs €74.28
- Up to 43% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i3-10105F - €0.21 vs €0.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 6% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i5-3330 - 201 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
189
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.13
100%
Value Winner
CHYYAC Intel Core I5-3330 I5 3330 3,0 GHz Quad-Core CPU Prozessor 6M 77W LGA 1155
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17018 minutes ago
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
56%
Price, €
€74.28
54%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for €74.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17017 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 77 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
