Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1760 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-3330 - 252 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 64 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
251
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |