Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2540M outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2540M is 671 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2540M
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1610 - 111 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-2540M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2540M | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
