Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3101 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €43.94 vs €72.85
- Up to 32% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 3 3200G - €0.3 vs €0.44 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 12% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-2500K - 165 vs 147 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
147
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for €72.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |