Buy on Amazon
€35.61
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500 is 238 days older than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Performs up to 6% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G530 - 116 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-2500 - €20.16 vs €35.61
- Up to 42% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i5-2500 - €0.18 vs €0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 65 vs 95 Watts
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-2500 CPU Verwendeter 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,3 GHz 6M 95W LGA1155
Buy for €35.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
109
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G530 CPU verwendet 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,4 GHz 2M 65W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2500
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
