Buy on Amazon
€128.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Core i5-2450M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1887 days newer than Core i5-2450M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2450M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-2450M - 121 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2450M - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 1700x Prozessor 3,4 GHz 16 MB L3
Buy for €128.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-2450M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2450M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-2450M or Ryzen 7 1700X
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, 1920 x 1080, Epic
14 FPS
€49.93/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 7 1700X
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
